Independent watchdog site · not affiliated with the City of Golden or the Golden Police Department

Deep dive

The program

What a Flock network actually does, what Golden’s own signed order form establishes about Golden’s, and, at equal length because it matters just as much, the specific things that document leaves out.

The machine

What is a Flock camera?

A Flock Safety license-plate reader is a solar-powered, cellular-connected still camera, usually pole-mounted over a road. Golden’s own order form describes the “Falcon” it bought as “an infrastructure-free license plate reader camera that utilizes Vehicle Fingerprint® technology to capture vehicular attributes,” and describes the search those attributes feed: “vehicle type, make, color, license plate state, missing / covered plates, and other unique features like bumper stickers, decals, and roof racks.” So a car can be searched for even when the plate is unreadable or absent.[1]

Two properties make it different from a traffic camera. First, it is indiscriminate: it records every vehicle, not only vehicles connected to a crime, building a movement history of an entire population of drivers. Second, it is networked. The images land in Flock’s cloud rather than on city property, and the FlockOS package Golden bought lists a “State Network” and a “Nationwide Network” for plate lookups among its included features.[1]

That second property is the whole of the Colorado argument. A camera bought by Golden to find stolen cars is also, potentially, a node other agencies can query for their own reasons. The Context page collects the Colorado cases where that is exactly what happened.

How it started

Cameras in 2021, a contract in 2023

The two dated facts in this record do not meet. This site does not guess at what connects them.

November 2021: the cameras go up

Denver7 reported that Golden police had installed “between 10 and 20” Flock license-plate readers across the city “since the beginning of November” 2021, placed, in Sgt. Ben Salentine’s words, “through high traffic areas, high crime areas,” and already credited with several arrests.[2]

The system ran, and produced numbers. By the first quarter of 2022 the department credited it with 52 recovered stolen vehicles, a 240 percent year-over-year increase, and by September 2022 CBS News Colorado reported Golden had 11 cameras, the exact count the 2023 form would sign for.[7] A camera network needs an agreement behind it; whatever agreement stood behind these cameras, a pilot, a trial, an earlier order form, is not in the record this site has.

July 2023: the order form

The earliest contract in this record is a Flock order form DocuSign-signed July 11, 2023, by Police Chief Joe Harvey for the “Golden (CO) Police Department” and by Flock’s General Counsel. It covers 11 Falcon cameras and FlockOS at $27,500 a year for 60 months.[1]

The form’s product terms say the term “shall commence upon first installation and validation of Flock Hardware.” If hardware had been installed and running since 2021, the form does not say how that clause applies to it.[1]

What the record cannot answer

Roughly twenty months separate the readers Denver7 reported from the signature on this order form, and the count moved from “between 10 and 20” to a contracted 11. This record contains no earlier agreement, no invoice, no purchase order and no payment record for that period, so this site cannot say what Golden paid, if anything, before July 2023, what terms governed the data those cameras collected, or when the 60-month clock actually started. A records request for any pre-2023 Flock agreement and the program’s invoices would settle all three: what to ask for.

The signed contract

What Golden pays for

Exhibit A order form, signed July 11, 2023. The cameras are priced as a bundle, not per unit.[1]
LineQuantityAmount
Flock Safety Platform: FlockOS (“Essentials” package) and Falcon LPR cameras1 / 11$27,500 a year
One-time fees None listed
Discounts line, against the Flock Safety Platform $27,500
Year one, invoiced at signing $27,500
Each year after, for the 60-month term $27,500
Contract total $137,500

The billing terms: Initial Term 60 months, Renewal Term 24 months, payment Net 30, “Annual Plan - First Year Invoiced at Signing,” Retention Period 30 days. The form lists a $27,500 “Discounts” line applied against the Flock Safety Platform; it does not itemize what list price the discount was taken from. The five-year total is the form’s own figure: $137,500.[1]

By executing the form, the customer also agreed to Flock’s standard Terms of Service as posted at flocksafety.com. Those terms are the vendor’s, they can change, and the copy in force in July 2023 is not part of the signed document, so this site quotes only what the signed pages themselves say.[1]

What the order form says the platform can reach

The form’s list of included FlockOS features is the plainest statement in the record of what the network is for:

“State Network (LP Lookup Only) … Allows agencies to look up license plates on all cameras opted in to the statewide Flock network.”

“Nationwide Network (LP Lookup Only) … Allows agencies to look up license plates on all cameras opted in to the nationwide Flock network.”

“Community Cameras (Full Access) … Access to all privately owned Flock devices within your jurisdiction that have been shared with you.”

“Direct Share - Surrounding Jurisdiction (Full Access) … Access to all Flock devices owned by law enforcement that have been directly shared with you.”

The question the contract leaves open

These are features Golden gets: searching other agencies’ cameras statewide and nationwide, receiving private feeds, taking direct shares from neighbors. Whether Golden’s own 11 cameras are opted in for other agencies to search is a configuration setting, not a contract term, and nothing in this record shows it. That setting is the single most important fact about the program, and it is unpublished.[1] The Colorado cases on the Context page are what that setting decides.

What has been published since is a claim, not a record. On the city’s own “Ask Golden” Q&A page, the department states that it owns the data, limits sharing “to Colorado law enforcement agencies,” keeps “auditable search logs,” and is “launching a transparency portal” that “should be in place in the near future.”[8] Those are welcome words, and they are checkable: the setting itself, a live portal, or an audit log would each verify them, and none has been published where this site could find it. For what it is worth, CBS News Colorado’s September 2025 survey named eight Colorado agencies that allow nationwide searches of their cameras, and Golden was not among them, though the survey counted only agencies that provided their data.[9]

The data terms, as written

  • Retention: 30 days. The order form’s header sets “Retention Period: 30 Days.” Nothing on the signed pages says what happens to a plate read that has been copied into a hot-list alert, an investigation, or another agency’s search results before day 30.[1]
  • Alerts wired to federal data: the included features list “Real-Time NCIC Alerts on Flock ALPR Cameras”: “alert sent when a vehicle entered into the NCIC crime database passes by a Flock camera,” plus “Unlimited Custom Hot Lists” any administrator can populate.[1]
  • Audit tooling exists: the “Flock Insights/Analytics page” is described as a reporting tool covering “user and network audits, plate read reports, hot list alert reports, event logs, and outcome reports.” The system can log who searched what; no term requires those logs to be published, and none has been.[1]
  • Renewal rides the budget: “Renewal is subject to annual budget appropriation,” the form’s own words. Every year Golden appropriates money for this line, it is choosing the program again.[1]
How it ends

Renews on its own, on a clock the record hides

The initial term is 60 months and “shall commence upon first installation and validation of Flock Hardware,” a date the record does not contain. The agreement then “will automatically renew for successive renewal terms of the greater of one year or the length set forth on the Order Form,” which sets 24 months, “unless either Party gives the other Party notice of non-renewal at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the then-current term.”[1]

Counted from the signature date, July 11, 2023, the initial term would end July 11, 2028, and the 30-day notice would come due by June 11, 2028. If the term instead began when hardware was installed and validated under this form, the real dates are later. Either way, missing the window commits the city to another two years at a time, not one.[1]

The lever the form itself hands the public

The contract cites no council vote coming in, but its renewal clause ends on eight words that point straight at one: “Renewal is subject to annual budget appropriation.” Golden’s council adopts a budget every fall. A line item the council declines to fund is a renewal that does not happen, which makes every budget season, not just June 2028, a decision point, and makes the appropriation question a fair one to put to council in public each year.[1] How to do that: Take Action.

Who holds it

Who actually runs the cameras

On paper, the police department does, end to end. The Flock customer of record, and even the form’s “Legal Entity Name,” is “Golden (CO) Police Department.” The signature for the customer is Police Chief Joe Harvey’s, dated July 11, 2023, over a block that names his title and nothing else: no City Clerk attestation, no City Attorney approval as to form, no City Manager, no Mayor, no resolution number. The accounts-payable contact is a city finance address; the billing runs through the city.[1]

The chief who signed it has since left. Joe Harvey stepped away from the role in January 2026 and announced his retirement that February, after roughly forty years in policing; Deputy Chief Mike Hendershot served as interim chief while the city ran a national search, and in July 2026 Golden named Michele Wagner, a former Lakewood police sergeant and chief investigator for the First Judicial District DA’s office, as its next chief.[3][4] The contract the previous chief signed runs on regardless: that is what a 60-month term with self-renewal means.

In August 2026, answering a resident’s published demand that the cameras come down, Chief Wagner wrote that the department has “a policy with parameters, guidance, rules and an audit process,” that it continues “to evaluate the benefits of Flock against the concerns of the public,” and that it “will be hosting a study session with Golden City Council.”[5] The policy she describes is exactly the kind of record this site publishes, and it is not yet in this record; neither is a date for the study session.

The negative space

What the city still has not disclosed

A watchdog site is only as honest as its account of what it failed to find. Each row below is something the record itself points to, and does not contain.

Records referenced by this site's record, or by the city's own published statements, that are not in it.
Missing recordWhere it is referencedWhy it matters
Any pre-2023 Flock agreementCameras reported live from November 2021[2]Twenty months of collection ran on terms nobody has published.
The department's ALPR policy and audit processChief Wagner's August 2026 response[5]The only operating rules the public has been told exist, unpublished in this record.
Sharing / network settingsThe order form's State and Nationwide Network features; the city's “Colorado law enforcement agencies” claim on Ask Golden[1][8]Which agencies can search Golden's cameras, and whether national lookup is on. The city has stated the answer; no record showing the setting has been published.
Camera locations11 cameras contracted; 18 Flock-tagged readers volunteer-mapped[1][6]Where the city's cameras are, and which mapped hardware is not the city's.
The term's start date“Commence upon first installation and validation”[1]Sets the real renewal and notice dates; this site can only bound them.
Search audit logsThe order form's “Insights/Analytics” description[1]Who searched which plate, and why. The system is described as able to log it.
Invoices and appropriations“First Year Invoiced at Signing”; “subject to annual budget appropriation”[1]Would show what has actually been paid, and which budget line renews the program each year.
Read this carefully

None of this establishes that Golden has done anything improper. It establishes that the public record of this program is, so far, one five-page order form and a handful of published statements, and that the parts that would show how the network is actually used, the policy, the settings, the logs, the locations, are still out of view. Any resident can request them: how.

Still open

Eight questions the record does not answer

  1. Are Golden's cameras opted into Flock's state or national lookup networks, and which agencies can search them today? The city's Q&A page says Colorado law enforcement only; the record that would show the setting is unpublished.
  2. What agreement governed the cameras between November 2021 and July 2023, and what did Golden pay under it?
  3. When did the 60-month term actually start, and therefore when does it actually end?
  4. Where are the 11 contracted cameras, and which of the 18 Flock-tagged readers volunteers have mapped are not the city's?
  5. What does the department's ALPR policy say, the one the chief described in August 2026, and where is it published?
  6. Has the audit process the chief described produced an audit, and what did it find?
  7. Which annual budget line appropriates the $27,500, and has council ever discussed it as a surveillance decision rather than a line item?
  8. When is the promised council study session, and will the public hear the renewal question before the contract answers it by default?
Citations

Sources for this page

  1. Flock Group Inc. / Golden (CO) Police Department, Order Form (Exhibit A) with billing schedule, product descriptions and FlockOS “Essentials” feature list, DocuSign-signed July 11, 2023 by Police Chief Joe Harvey and Flock General Counsel Mark Smith (5 pp.). PDF, 0.8 MBTerms, quantities and retention on the order-form page; billing schedule and discounts on the following page; product and feature descriptions after that; renewal language in the order form's closing note; signatures on the final page. SHA-256 checksum on the Records page.
  2. “Golden police install license plate readers across city, make several arrests using the technology,” Denver7 (KMGH), reported when the cameras went in (installations “since the beginning of November” 2021). denver7.com
  3. “Golden police chief retires after leave,” Colorado Politics, February 23, 2026; and “Golden police chief temporarily steps away from role,” Colorado Politics, January 29, 2026. coloradopolitics.com
  4. “After rocky year for Golden cops, Lakewood vet takes the top badge,” Hoodline, July 1, 2026. hoodline.com
  5. City of Golden, “Council Comments” page (published emails to [email protected] and staff responses), read September 29, 2026: Chief Michele Wagner's August 31, 2026 response to a resident's ALPR-removal demand. cityofgolden.govThe city removes published comments after 30 days, so the quoted exchange may no longer appear at the link; the quotes here carry their own dates.
  6. OpenStreetMap surveillance data: Overpass API query for nodes tagged man_made=surveillance with surveillance:type=ALPR inside the City of Golden boundary (OSM relation 112204), retrieved September 29, 2026. JSON · Exact query and methodMap data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL); camera reports contributed by volunteers.
  7. “Jefferson County installs license plate reader cameras amid rise in car thefts,” CBS News Colorado, September 27, 2022. cbsnews.comGolden's 11 cameras, in use “for approximately one year”; the first-quarter 2022 figures (52 recovered stolen vehicles, up 240 percent) and Sgt. Cody Schroeder's account.
  8. City of Golden, “Ask Golden” Q&A page (Guiding Golden), read September 29, 2026. guidinggolden.comThe city's published answer on its Flock program: 11 city-owned cameras, 30-day retention, sharing limited “to Colorado law enforcement agencies,” “auditable search logs,” and a transparency portal “in the near future.” The answer carries no posting date on the page.
  9. Shaun Boyd, “Crime fighter or mass surveillance? In Colorado, license plate readers are high-tech and widespread,” CBS News Colorado, September 22, 2025. cbsnews.comThe named agencies allowing nationwide search were Arvada, Aurora, Greeley, Lafayette, Northglenn, Jefferson County, Summit County and Westminster; the survey covered only agencies that provided data, so Golden's absence from the list is not a finding about Golden.